Page 52 - Agricultural Census 2000 NWFP Vol II Part 1

· NOTES ON TABLES

1. In this report the table headings, has also been used in the same
spanners, column captions and sense for information processed
stubs, by and large, are easily at household / holding level.
comprehensible. While, where
ever necessary, explanatory 4. In the tables providing break
foot notes have been appended down of data on an item and its
under relevant table for components, with possibility of
convenience of the users. multiple reporting, alongwith the
number of farms for total as well
2. As per laid down scheme, the - as for each of the components,
data about each fam1 1s the number of farms for each of
presented in the administrative . its components may add up in
unit where tlie holder was excess to the number of farms
enumerated . irrespective of for the total.
location of the farm.
Consequently, the data on 5. In rare cases, farms reporting
farms and farm practices shown certain minor crops in a district
against an administrative unit may appear under the relevant
pertain to the farms not column but there may be no
necessarily located within that crop area reported against the
.
administrative unit. same because of the estimated
-
figure for area being less than
3. The terni . "Farms Reporting" half an acre and hence not
. has been used in a number of rounded upto a complete acre .

tables to indicate the estimated
number of farms which reported . 6. In some cases, component
the data of the items under figures may not add up to their
consideration, meaning thereby totals and percentages to
that in the remaining farms the hundred due to rounding effect.
data of the item concerned
was nii. The term "Households
Reporting / Holdings Reporting"

( L )